Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZAX
CIMAX vs RAZAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZAX
CIMAX vs RAZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAZAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. RAZAX (605M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZAX: CIMAX (3.44) vs RAZAX (2.29). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAZAX (9 years). RAZAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAZAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). RAZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZAX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. CIMAX (7.80). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.21 vs. RAZAX (24.71).
| CIMAX | RAZAX | CIMAX / RAZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.15 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.680 | 7.492 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 605M | 24,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 2.29 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 16.35 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.58 | 43.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 24.71 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement