Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZAX
CIMAX vs RAZAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZAX
CIMAX vs RAZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAZAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RAZAX (604M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZAX: CIMAX (3.36) vs RAZAX (2.33). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZAX: CIMAX (25 years) vs RAZAX (9 years). RAZAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAZAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). RAZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZAX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. CIMAX (8.35). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. RAZAX (24.32).
| CIMAX | RAZAX | CIMAX / RAZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.15 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.076 | 8.295 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 604M | 24,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 2.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 12.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.60 | 42.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.87 | 24.32 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement