Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C
Price$10.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets558.8M
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RAZCX (559M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.85) vs RAZCX (2.73). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RAZCX (8 years). RAZCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. RAZCX (7.96). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.28 vs. RAZCX (24.10).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.89 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 2.07 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.838 | 3.377 | 143% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 559M | 22,898% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.73 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 7.96 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.93 | 23.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.28 | 24.10 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...