Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RAZCX (610M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.40) vs RAZCX (1.73). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (25 years) vs RAZCX (9 years). RAZCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. CIMAX (9.33). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.63 vs. RAZCX (23.46).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.90 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.08 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.581 | 8.577 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 610M | 24,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 1.73 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 12.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 43.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | 23.46 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers