Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.35B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
Price$11.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets589.97M
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RMGSX (590M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.55) vs RMGSX (3.31). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). RMGSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.84 vs. CIMAX (10.57). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.85 vs. RMGSX (35.00).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.07 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.122 | 15.658 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 590M | 23,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 3.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 11.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 55.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.85 | 35.00 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement