Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
Price$11.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets574.04M
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. RMGSX (574M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.67) vs RMGSX (3.48). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RMGSX (8 years). RMGSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX (14.21) and CIMAX (14.20) have marching annual gain over last year. CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.70 vs. RMGSX (27.68).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.07 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.048 | 10.390 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 574M | 23,519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 3.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 14.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.16 | 33.23 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.70 | 27.68 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement