Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.03B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
Price$10.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.46M
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. RMGSX (557M). CIMAX (3.85) and RMGSX (3.70) have matching dividends . CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RMGSX (8 years). RMGSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RMGSX (8.16). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. RMGSX (28.93).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.07 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.962 | 3.471 | 143% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 557M | 22,980% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 3.70 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 8.16 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.32 | 25.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 28.93 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...