Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.63B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
Price$11.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets575.11M
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. RMGSX (575M). CIMAX (3.73) and RMGSX (3.59) have matching dividends . CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RMGSX (8 years). RMGSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. RMGSX (9.95). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.27 vs. RMGSX (26.58).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.07 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.010 | 7.002 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 575M | 23,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 3.59 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 9.95 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.42 | 36.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 26.58 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers