Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. RMGSX (611M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.44) vs RMGSX (2.49). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). RMGSX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.56 vs. CIMAX (8.91). CIMAX (24.80) and RMGSX (24.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.08 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.963 | 7.956 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 611M | 24,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 2.49 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 17.56 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.11 | 45.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.80 | 24.61 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers