Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RMGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RMGSX (610M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.40) vs RMGSX (2.58). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (25 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). RMGSX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. CIMAX (9.33). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.63 vs. RMGSX (28.94).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.08 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.581 | 9.167 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 610M | 24,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 2.58 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 13.71 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 47.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | 28.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers