Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RMGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. RMGSX (606M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.48) vs RMGSX (2.50). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). RMGSX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. CIMAX (6.82). CIMAX (26.46) and RMGSX (26.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.08 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 7.712 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 606M | 23,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 2.50 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 14.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 41.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 26.09 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement