Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.53
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.92B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.93M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FGGBX (305M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMCX (2.95) vs FGGBX (2.60). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX (10.72) and CIMCX (10.40) have marching annual gain over last year. CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.10 vs. FGGBX (27.24).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.213 | 14.644 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 305M | 43,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.40 | 10.72 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.28 | 36.38 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.10 | 27.24 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.20 | 13.60 | 428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement