Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$27.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.58B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.5M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FGGBX (311M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMCX (2.96) vs FGGBX (2.62). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. CIMCX (9.76). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. FGGBX (28.39).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.539 | 18.906 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 311M | 44,051% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.62 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 13.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.71 | 37.14 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.82 | 28.39 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.31 | 25.73 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement