Ad is loading...
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$25.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.03B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.22M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FGGBX (292M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMCX (3.10) vs FGGBX (2.13). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.99). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. FGGBX (6.11). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. FGGBX (24.20).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.743 | 7.143 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 292M | 43,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.13 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.84 | 6.11 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.70 | 19.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.98 | 24.20 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.34 | 5.44 | 888% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers