Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.05M
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FGGBX (306M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMCX (2.96) vs FGGBX (2.62). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. CIMCX (13.38). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.39 vs. FGGBX (27.65).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.587 | 15.923 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 306M | 44,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.62 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | 16.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.33 | 30.86 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.39 | 27.65 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.16 | 16.33 | 368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement