Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FGGBX (338M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FGGBX (5.61) vs CIMCX (2.68). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FGGBX (50.24). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.82 vs. CIMCX (8.21). FGGBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.15 vs. CIMCX (23.35).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.96 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.843 | 13.557 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 338M | 42,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 5.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 26.82 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 51.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 38.15 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.21 | 64.32 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement