Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FGGBX
CIMCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FGGBX (326M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FGGBX (6.11) vs CIMCX (2.73). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FGGBX (50.24). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.21 vs. CIMCX (6.97). FGGBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.53 vs. CIMCX (21.45).
| CIMCX | FGGBX | CIMCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.89 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.96 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.319 | 8.319 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 326M | 45,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 6.11 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 24.21 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 50.42 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | 29.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.35 | 63.32 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement