Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.14B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.67M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (406M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.15) vs CIMCX (2.96). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. CIMCX (11.01). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 71.78 vs. CIMCX (38.04).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.11 | 1,236% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.667 | 12.110 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 406M | 33,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 6.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 13.78 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.82 | 31.91 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | 71.78 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers