Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.16
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.37B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.49M
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FQTEX (365M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.17) vs CIMCX (3.01). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). CIMCX (12.82) and FQTEX (12.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.73 vs. CIMCX (42.82).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.11 | 1,236% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.676 | 8.038 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 365M | 36,438% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 6.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 12.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 38.47 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.82 | 73.73 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.91 | N/A | - |