Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FQTEX (690M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.44) vs CIMCX (2.64). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (25 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.34 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.03 vs. CIMCX (4.11). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 60.84 vs. CIMCX (23.14).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.08 | 1,688% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 12.194 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 690M | 21,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 6.44 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 19.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 58.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 60.84 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement