Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FQTEX (617M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.38) vs CIMCX (2.73). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.34 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.47 vs. CIMCX (6.97). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.29 vs. CIMCX (21.45).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.08 | 1,688% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.319 | 7.292 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 617M | 23,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 6.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 21.47 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 56.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | 57.29 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers