Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FQTEX
CIMCX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FQTEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FQTEX (650M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: FQTEX (6.53) vs CIMCX (2.68). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.34 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.13 vs. CIMCX (8.21). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. CIMCX (23.35).
| CIMCX | FQTEX | CIMCX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.08 | 1,688% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.843 | 9.634 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 650M | 22,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 6.53 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 21.13 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 51.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 57.64 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement