Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FSBLX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$27.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.58B
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R6
Price$22.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.29M
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FSBLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FSBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FSBLX (279M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMCX (2.96) vs FSBLX (2.33). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FSBLX (9 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSBLX (1.11). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CIMCX (92.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.07 vs. CIMCX (9.76). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. FSBLX (16.75).
| CIMCX | FSBLX | CIMCX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.11 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.539 | 10.994 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 279M | 49,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.33 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 11.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.71 | 33.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.82 | 16.75 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement