Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FSBLX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529C
Price$26.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.87B
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R6
Price$21.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.8M
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FSBLX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and FSBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FSBLX (277M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMCX (2.96) vs FSBLX (2.33). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMCX (23 years) vs FSBLX (9 years). CIMCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSBLX (1.11). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CIMCX (92.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.44 vs. CIMCX (13.38). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.39 vs. FSBLX (17.27).
| CIMCX | FSBLX | CIMCX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.11 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.587 | 9.136 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 277M | 48,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.33 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | 15.44 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.33 | 28.67 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.39 | 17.27 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement