Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FSBLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FSBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FSBLX (285M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMCX (2.64) vs FSBLX (2.17). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMCX (25 years) vs FSBLX (10 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSBLX (1.10). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. CIMCX (4.11). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.14 vs. FSBLX (11.98).
| CIMCX | FSBLX | CIMCX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.10 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 8.778 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 285M | 52,632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.17 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 8.18 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 42.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 11.98 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | 61.73 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement