Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs FSBLX
CIMCX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. FSBLX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and FSBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FSBLX (286M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMCX (2.68) vs FSBLX (2.21). CIMCX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMCX (24 years) vs FSBLX (10 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSBLX (1.10). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMCX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. CIMCX (8.21). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. FSBLX (12.08).
| CIMCX | FSBLX | CIMCX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.84 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.10 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.843 | 7.771 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 286M | 50,699% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.21 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 11.75 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 36.95 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 12.08 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.21 | 60.60 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers