Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLAX (76.3M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLAX (3.07) vs CIMCX (2.64). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMCX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. CIMCX (4.11). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. CIMCX (23.14).
| CIMCX | HRLAX | CIMCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.69 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 15.871 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.3M | 196,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 20.01 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 42.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 48.93 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | 90.79 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement