Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and HRLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLAX (65.8M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLAX (3.30) vs CIMCX (2.73). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMCX (24 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. CIMCX (5.53). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.42 vs. CIMCX (21.66).
| CIMCX | HRLAX | CIMCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.69 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.484 | 10.581 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 65.8M | 220,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 3.30 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 18.34 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.43 | 37.59 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.66 | 43.42 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.73 | 79.32 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers