Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLAX
CIMCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HRLAX (76.8M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLAX (3.14) vs CIMCX (2.68). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMCX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.17 vs. CIMCX (8.46). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.50 vs. CIMCX (25.69).
| CIMCX | HRLAX | CIMCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.25 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.69 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 17.842 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 76.8M | 192,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 3.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 25.17 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 48.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.69 | 55.50 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.21 | 89.12 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers