Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLCX
CIMCX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLCX
CIMCX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Buy and HRLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLCX (65.8M). CIMCX (2.73) and HRLCX (2.66) have matching dividends . CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMCX (24 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMCX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. CIMCX (5.96). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.28 vs. CIMCX (21.70).
| CIMCX | HRLCX | CIMCX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.00 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.54 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.484 | 10.128 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 65.8M | 220,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 2.66 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 17.42 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.81 | 32.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.70 | 38.28 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.12 | 67.77 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement