Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLCX
CIMCX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLCX
CIMCX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLCX (76.3M). CIMCX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMCX (2.64) vs HRLCX (2.48). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMCX (25 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMCX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. CIMCX (4.11). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. CIMCX (23.14).
| CIMCX | HRLCX | CIMCX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.00 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.54 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 15.352 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.3M | 196,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 19.17 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 39.43 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 43.51 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | 78.90 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers