Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLSX
CIMCX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLSX
CIMCX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and HRLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLSX (76.7M). HRLSX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLSX (3.10) vs CIMCX (2.64). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: CIMCX (25 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: HRLSX (0) vs CIMCX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. CIMCX (4.11). HRLSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.39 vs. CIMCX (23.14).
| CIMCX | HRLSX | CIMCX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.71 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 15.996 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.7M | 195,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 20.18 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 42.74 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 49.39 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | 91.89 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement