Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLSX
CIMCX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLSX
CIMCX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. HRLSX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and HRLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLSX (67.9M). HRLSX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLSX (3.33) vs CIMCX (2.73). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: CIMCX (24 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CIMCX (1.35). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: HRLSX (0) vs CIMCX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.01 vs. CIMCX (8.21). HRLSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.23 vs. CIMCX (23.35).
| CIMCX | HRLSX | CIMCX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.71 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.843 | 14.757 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 67.9M | 213,549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 3.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | 24.01 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.79 | 40.10 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 48.23 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.21 | 90.52 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers