Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLZX
CIMCX vs HRLZX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLZX
CIMCX vs HRLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLZX (64.8M). HRLZX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLZX (3.49) vs CIMCX (2.73). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLZX: CIMCX (24 years) vs HRLZX (4 years). CIMCX (1.35) and HRLZX (1.30) have similar cost to investors . HRLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). HRLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: HRLZX (0) vs CIMCX (250). HRLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. CIMCX (6.30).
| CIMCX | HRLZX | CIMCX / HRLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.746 | 9.346 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 64.8M | 226,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 3.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 18.07 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 39.62 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.09 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement