Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs HRLZX
CIMCX vs HRLZX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs HRLZX
CIMCX vs HRLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLZX (76.7M). HRLZX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: HRLZX (3.38) vs CIMCX (2.64). CIMCX was incepted earlier than HRLZX: CIMCX (25 years) vs HRLZX (5 years). CIMCX (1.35) and HRLZX (1.30) have similar cost to investors . HRLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). HRLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: HRLZX (0) vs CIMCX (250). HRLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.53 vs. CIMCX (4.11).
| CIMCX | HRLZX | CIMCX / HRLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 16.199 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.7M | 195,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 20.53 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 43.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement