Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs LGMAX
CIMCX vs LGMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs LGMAX
CIMCX vs LGMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. LGMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and LGMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LGMAX (2.83B). CIMCX pays higher dividends than LGMAX: CIMCX (2.68) vs LGMAX (0.95). CIMCX was incepted earlier than LGMAX: CIMCX (25 years) vs LGMAX (21 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LGMAX (1.16). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMAX (35.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMAX: CIMCX (250) vs LGMAX (2500). LGMAX (8.47) and CIMCX (8.46) have marching annual gain over last year. CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.69 vs. LGMAX (-3.79).
| CIMCX | LGMAX | CIMCX / LGMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.15 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.16 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 9.313 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 2.83B | 5,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 0.95 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 8.47 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 29.52 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.69 | -3.79 | -679% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.21 | 50.23 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers