Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs LGMAX
CIMCX vs LGMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs LGMAX
CIMCX vs LGMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. LGMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and LGMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. LGMAX (2.83B). CIMCX pays higher dividends than LGMAX: CIMCX (2.73) vs LGMAX (0.96). CIMCX was incepted earlier than LGMAX: CIMCX (24 years) vs LGMAX (20 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than LGMAX (1.16). CIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMAX (35.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMAX: CIMCX (250) vs LGMAX (2500). LGMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. CIMCX (6.97). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. LGMAX (-3.90).
| CIMCX | LGMAX | CIMCX / LGMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.16 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.16 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.319 | 6.472 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 2.83B | 5,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 0.96 | 284% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 10.35 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 26.67 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | -3.90 | -550% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.35 | 57.65 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement