Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs RMGSX
CIMCX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs RMGSX
CIMCX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. RMGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and RMGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RMGSX (610M). CIMCX (2.68) and RMGSX (2.58) have matching dividends . CIMCX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMCX (25 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMGSX (1.08). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMCX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. CIMCX (8.46). RMGSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.94 vs. CIMCX (25.69).
| CIMCX | RMGSX | CIMCX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.08 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 9.167 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 610M | 24,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.58 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 13.71 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 47.74 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.69 | 28.94 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.21 | N/A | - |