Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMCX vs UTMAX
CIMCX vs UTMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMCX vs UTMAX
CIMCX vs UTMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMCX vs. UTMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMCX is a Hold and UTMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. UTMAX (57.8M). UTMAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: UTMAX (3.20) vs CIMCX (2.64). CIMCX was incepted earlier than UTMAX: CIMCX (25 years) vs UTMAX (11 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than UTMAX (0.70). UTMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). UTMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMCX: UTMAX (0) vs CIMCX (250). UTMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. CIMCX (4.11). CIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.14 vs. UTMAX (4.12).
| CIMCX | UTMAX | CIMCX / UTMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.68 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.076 | 9.904 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 57.8M | 259,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.11 | 12.16 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 49.37 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | 4.12 | 562% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.77 | 46.09 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement