Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMDX vs MVCAX
CIMDX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMDX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Founders Institutional
Price$16.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets819.88M
CIMDX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMDX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMDX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. CIMDX (820M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CIMDX: MVCAX (0.87) vs CIMDX (0.45). CIMDX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CIMDX (8 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) and CIMDX (0.99) have similar cost to investors . MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CIMDX (17.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMDX: MVCAX (1000) vs CIMDX (10000). CIMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.92 vs. MVCAX (-1.70). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. CIMDX (46.72).
| CIMDX | MVCAX | CIMDX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.99 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.00 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.263 | 3.814 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 820M | 17.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.87 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | -1.70 | -585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.87 | 16.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.72 | 54.59 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement