Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMDX vs MVCAX
CIMDX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMDX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Founders Institutional
Price$16.79
Change+$0.39 (+2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.34M
CIMDX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMDX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMDX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. CIMDX (806M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CIMDX: MVCAX (0.86) vs CIMDX (0.45). CIMDX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CIMDX (9 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) and CIMDX (0.99) have similar cost to investors . MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CIMDX (17.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMDX: MVCAX (1000) vs CIMDX (10000). CIMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. MVCAX (-2.36). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.54 vs. CIMDX (40.96).
| CIMDX | MVCAX | CIMDX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.99 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.00 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.201 | 5.671 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 17.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.86 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | -2.36 | -309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.79 | 13.35 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.96 | 54.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.13 | - |