Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs HRLAX
CIMEX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs HRLAX
CIMEX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. HRLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HRLAX (76.8M). CIMEX (3.19) and HRLAX (3.14) have matching dividends . CIMEX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMEX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMEX (65.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMEX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.17 vs. CIMEX (9.03). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.50 vs. CIMEX (29.04).
| CIMEX | HRLAX | CIMEX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.25 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.69 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.417 | 17.842 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 76.8M | 192,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 25.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.25 | 48.16 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.04 | 55.50 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.10 | 89.12 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement