Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs HRLAX
CIMEX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs HRLAX
CIMEX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. HRLAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLAX (67.6M). CIMEX (3.19) and HRLAX (3.14) have matching dividends . CIMEX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMEX (24 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMEX (65.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMEX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.41 vs. CIMEX (8.78). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.24 vs. CIMEX (26.59).
| CIMEX | HRLAX | CIMEX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.25 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.69 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.154 | 14.212 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 67.6M | 214,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | 23.41 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.90 | 39.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.59 | 47.24 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.09 | 88.72 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers