Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs HRLCX
CIMEX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs HRLCX
CIMEX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. HRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLCX (76.3M). CIMEX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMEX (3.15) vs HRLCX (2.48). CIMEX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMEX (25 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMEX (65.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMEX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. CIMEX (4.65). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. CIMEX (26.32).
| CIMEX | HRLCX | CIMEX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.00 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.54 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.427 | 15.352 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.3M | 196,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 19.17 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.37 | 39.43 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | 43.51 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.69 | 78.90 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers