Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs HRLCX
CIMEX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs HRLCX
CIMEX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. HRLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Buy and HRLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLCX (65.8M). CIMEX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMEX (3.26) vs HRLCX (2.66). CIMEX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMEX (24 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMEX (65.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMEX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. CIMEX (6.52). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.28 vs. CIMEX (24.90).
| CIMEX | HRLCX | CIMEX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.00 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 2.54 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.749 | 10.128 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 65.8M | 220,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.66 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 17.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 32.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.90 | 38.28 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.77 | 67.77 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers