Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs WASCX
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
Price$27.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.64B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$21.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. WASCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and WASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. WASCX (1.79B). CIMEX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMEX (3.36) vs WASCX (0.72). CIMEX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMEX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMEX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. WASCX (4.70). CIMEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.37 vs. WASCX (5.85).
| CIMEX | WASCX | CIMEX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.723 | 12.511 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 1.79B | 7,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 0.72 | 466% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.47 | 4.70 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.19 | 16.77 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.37 | 5.85 | 656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.28 | 1.52 | 4,884% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement