Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs WASCX
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
Price$26.65
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.23B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$20.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. WASCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Buy and WASCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. WASCX (1.81B). CIMEX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMEX (3.46) vs WASCX (0.76). CIMEX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMEX (23 years) vs WASCX (30 years). WASCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.84). CIMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WASCX (67.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMEX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.99 vs. WASCX (7.73). CIMEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.43 vs. WASCX (9.74).
| CIMEX | WASCX | CIMEX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.81 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.81 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.218 | 10.367 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.81B | 7,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 0.76 | 457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 7.73 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.57 | 12.87 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.43 | 9.74 | 426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.46 | -4.93 | -1,431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement