Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMEX vs WASCX
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMEX vs WASCX
CIMEX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMEX vs. WASCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMEX is a Hold and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. WASCX (1.8B). CIMEX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMEX (3.15) vs WASCX (1.25). CIMEX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMEX (25 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMEX (0.83). WASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. CIMEX (65.00). CIMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMEX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. WASCX (-1.50). CIMEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.32 vs. WASCX (-8.95).
| CIMEX | WASCX | CIMEX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.427 | 5.925 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 1.8B | 8,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 1.25 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | -1.50 | -309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.37 | 26.47 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | -8.95 | -294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.69 | 17.48 | 444% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement