CINGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
CMPD
Price
$3.00
Change
-$0.53 (-15.01%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.12M
Ad is loading...

CINGF vs CMPD

Header iconCINGF vs CMPD Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs CMPDBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization2.1M
CompuMed
Price$3.00
Change-$0.53 (-15.01%)
Volume$4.55K
Capitalization4.12M
CINGF vs CMPD Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. CMPD commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and CMPD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.03 vs. CMPD: $3.00)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and CMPD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 7% vs. CMPD: 307%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. CMPD: $4.12M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. CMPD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMPD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMPD is a better buy in the long-term than CINGF.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while CMPD (@Packaged Software) price change was -21.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMPD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-7.78% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMPD($4.12M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CMPD YTD gains are higher at: -21.260 vs. CINGF (-32.221). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. CMPD (-196K). CINGF has more cash in the bank: 173K vs. CMPD (50K). CMPD has higher revenues than CINGF: CMPD (1.68M) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFCMPDCINGF / CMPD
Capitalization2.1M4.12M51%
EBITDA318K-196K-162%
Gain YTD-32.221-21.260152%
P/E Ratio175.44N/A-
Revenue214K1.68M13%
Total Cash173K50K346%
Total DebtN/A190K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF vs CMPD: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
CMPD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
666
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
212
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMPD's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (86). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CINGF (66). This means that CMPD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CMPD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (64). This means that CMPD’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CMPD (12). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CMPD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBDAX15.450.07
+0.46%
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
STMDX33.82N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Real Estate I
HGHYX40.17-0.27
-0.67%
Hartford Healthcare Y
LGMCX21.21-0.16
-0.75%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C
PMBMX37.00-0.35
-0.94%
Principal MidCap R3

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
+18.18%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.53%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMPD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPD has been loosely correlated with OCLCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPD jumps, then OCLCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMPD
1D Price
Change %
CMPD100%
-14.97%
OCLCF - CMPD
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IARGF - CMPD
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CINGF - CMPD
7%
Poorly correlated
+18.18%
LFMD - CMPD
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
CDTAF - CMPD
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
More