Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPIX vs FSMAX
CIPIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIPIX vs FSMAX
CIPIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPIX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CIPIX (1.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CIPIX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CIPIX (0.00). CIPIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CIPIX (15 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CIPIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CIPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPIX: FSMAX (0) vs CIPIX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.91 vs. CIPIX (-14.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.50 vs. CIPIX (-28.07).
| CIPIX | FSMAX | CIPIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.04 | 2,457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.04 | 2,457% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.930 | 14.652 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 42.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.69 | 29.91 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.35 | 67.58 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.07 | 37.50 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.16 | 147.63 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers