Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPIX vs FSMAX
CIPIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIPIX vs FSMAX
CIPIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPIX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. CIPIX (1.19B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CIPIX: FSMAX (0.48) vs CIPIX (0.00). CIPIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CIPIX (16 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CIPIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CIPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPIX: FSMAX (0) vs CIPIX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. CIPIX (-13.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. CIPIX (-26.88).
| CIPIX | FSMAX | CIPIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.04 | 2,457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.04 | 2,457% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.508 | 15.913 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 43.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.02 | 24.38 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.42 | 63.28 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.88 | 39.12 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.80 | 139.20 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers