Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CIPMX (1.09B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CIPMX: FSMAX (0.49) vs CIPMX (0.00). CIPMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CIPMX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CIPMX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CIPMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPMX: FSMAX (0) vs CIPMX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. CIPMX (-12.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. CIPMX (-32.89).
| CIPMX | FSMAX | CIPMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.308 | 14.205 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 40.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.95 | 14.97 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.84 | 66.32 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.89 | 33.60 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.35 | 133.38 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers