Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CIPMX vs FSMAX
CIPMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CIPMX (1.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CIPMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CIPMX (0.00). CIPMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CIPMX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CIPMX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CIPMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPMX: FSMAX (0) vs CIPMX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.99 vs. CIPMX (-16.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.99 vs. CIPMX (-30.35).
| CIPMX | FSMAX | CIPMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.04 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.036 | 15.685 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 42.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.30 | 29.99 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.97 | 69.09 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.35 | 36.99 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.09 | 149.87 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers