Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIPNX vs NRGSX
CIPNX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIPNX vs NRGSX
CIPNX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIPNX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIPNX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. CIPNX (496M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CIPNX: NRGSX (0.44) vs CIPNX (0.00). CIPNX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CIPNX (10 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). CIPNX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CIPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIPNX: NRGSX (0) vs CIPNX (1000000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.11 vs. CIPNX (-16.97). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -23.14 vs. CIPNX (-26.39).
| CIPNX | NRGSX | CIPNX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.086 | 11.425 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 496M | 6.95B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.97 | -8.11 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.56 | 2.69 | -429% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.39 | -23.14 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.65 | 10.53 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers