Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison
Open Charts CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIRAX vs. FBBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIRAX is a Hold and FBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIRAX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. FBBAX (68.9M). FBBAX pays higher dividends than CIRAX: FBBAX (3.70) vs CIRAX (2.70). CIRAX was incepted earlier than FBBAX: CIRAX (24 years) vs FBBAX (33 years). FBBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CIRAX (0.60). CIRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBBAX (22.00). FBBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIRAX (4%) vs CIRAX (4%). CIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBBAX: CIRAX (250) vs FBBAX (1000). CIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. FBBAX (3.84). CIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.24 vs. FBBAX (7.64).
| CIRAX | FBBAX | CIRAX / FBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.167 | 1.672 | 429% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127B | 68.9M | 184,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 3.84 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.48 | 11.12 | 373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.24 | 7.64 | 514% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.75 | 57.90 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers