Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison
Open Charts CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIRAX vs. FBBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIRAX is a Hold and FBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIRAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FBBAX (67.1M). FBBAX pays higher dividends than CIRAX: FBBAX (3.70) vs CIRAX (2.70). CIRAX was incepted earlier than FBBAX: CIRAX (24 years) vs FBBAX (33 years). FBBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CIRAX (0.60). CIRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBBAX (22.00). FBBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIRAX (4%) vs CIRAX (4%). CIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBBAX: CIRAX (250) vs FBBAX (1000). CIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.87 vs. FBBAX (1.34). CIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.03 vs. FBBAX (2.54).
| CIRAX | FBBAX | CIRAX / FBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.288 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 67.1M | 190,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.87 | 1.34 | 888% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 9.17 | 450% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.03 | 2.54 | 1,576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.68 | 55.59 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement