Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison
Open Charts CIRAX vs FBBAX
CIRAX vs FBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIRAX vs. FBBAX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIRAX is a Hold and FBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIRAX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FBBAX (61.5M). FBBAX pays higher dividends than CIRAX: FBBAX (3.74) vs CIRAX (2.65). CIRAX was incepted earlier than FBBAX: CIRAX (25 years) vs FBBAX (34 years). FBBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CIRAX (0.60). CIRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBBAX (22.00). FBBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIRAX (4%) vs CIRAX (4%). CIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBBAX: CIRAX (250) vs FBBAX (1000). CIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.60 vs. FBBAX (-3.91). CIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.46 vs. FBBAX (0.18).
| CIRAX | FBBAX | CIRAX / FBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.32 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.505 | -1.520 | -625% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 61.5M | 213,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.74 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | -3.91 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 4.03 | 1,076% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.46 | 0.18 | 23,837% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.55 | 53.79 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement