Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIRAX vs FESGX
CIRAX vs FESGX Comparison
Open Charts CIRAX vs FESGX
CIRAX vs FESGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIRAX vs. FESGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIRAX is a Hold and FESGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIRAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FESGX (73.9B). CIRAX (2.70) and FESGX (2.64) have matching dividends . CIRAX was incepted earlier than FESGX: CIRAX (24 years) vs FESGX (26 years). FESGX (1.85) is less costly to investors than CIRAX (0.60). CIRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FESGX (15.99). CIRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FESGX: CIRAX (250) vs FESGX (2500). FESGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. CIRAX (12.47). CIRAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.84 vs. FESGX (30.43).
| CIRAX | FESGX | CIRAX / FESGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.85 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.85 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.486 | 4.422 | 169% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 73.9B | 173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.47 | 14.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.53 | 40.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.84 | 30.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.05 | 63.62 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement