It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CISCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEDC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GEDC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CISCF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GEDC (@Information Technology Services) price change was +3.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.71%.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CISCF | GEDC | CISCF / GEDC | |
Capitalization | 2.63M | 50.5M | 5% |
EBITDA | 1.14M | -11.26M | -10% |
Gain YTD | -69.925 | 108.333 | -65% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 39.6M | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 685K | 298K | 230% |
Total Debt | 4.91M | 528K | 931% |
GEDC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CISCF | GEDC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago49% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago38% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CSURX | 23.17 | -0.10 | -0.43% |
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R | |||
FCGAX | 151.34 | -0.77 | -0.51% |
Franklin Growth Adv | |||
KNGLX | 12.52 | -0.07 | -0.56% |
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Inv | |||
TLVIX | 29.92 | -0.20 | -0.66% |
Thrivent Large Cap Value S | |||
LBGIX | 46.81 | -0.50 | -1.06% |
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CISCF and DMRC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISCF and DMRC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CISCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CISCF | 100% | N/A | ||
DMRC - CISCF | 25% Poorly correlated | +8.31% | ||
GEDC - CISCF | 0% Poorly correlated | +14.29% | ||
HLEO - CISCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NONEY - CISCF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PVTRF - CISCF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GEDC and ARBB have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEDC and ARBB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GEDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GEDC | 100% | +14.29% | ||
ARBB - GEDC | 1% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
CISCF - GEDC | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CTM - GEDC | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
NONEY - GEDC | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FCCN - GEDC | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More |