CISCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.86M
GEDC
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.58 (-29.15%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
35.58M
Ad is loading...

CISCF vs GEDC

Header iconCISCF vs GEDC Comparison
Open Charts CISCF vs GEDCBanner chart's image
CISCOM
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$472
Capitalization1.86M
CalEthos
Price$1.41
Change-$0.58 (-29.15%)
Volume$200
Capitalization35.58M
CISCF vs GEDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
GEDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CISCF vs. GEDC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISCF is a Buy and GEDC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CISCF: $0.04 vs. GEDC: $1.41)
Brand notoriety: CISCF and GEDC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CISCF: 100% vs. GEDC: 11%
Market capitalization -- CISCF: $1.86M vs. GEDC: $35.58M
CISCF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $1.86M. GEDC’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $35.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $220.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CISCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEDC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CISCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GEDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CISCF and GEDC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GEDC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GEDC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CISCF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GEDC (@Information Technology Services) price change was -29.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.43% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEDC($35.6M) has a higher market cap than CISCF($1.86M). GEDC YTD gains are higher at: 0.714 vs. CISCF (0.000). CISCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.14M vs. GEDC (-11.74M). CISCF has more cash in the bank: 685K vs. GEDC (156K). GEDC has less debt than CISCF: GEDC (750K) vs CISCF (4.91M). CISCF has higher revenues than GEDC: CISCF (39.6M) vs GEDC (0).
CISCFGEDCCISCF / GEDC
Capitalization1.86M35.6M5%
EBITDA1.14M-11.74M-10%
Gain YTD0.0000.714-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.6M0-
Total Cash685K156K439%
Total Debt4.91M750K655%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEDC: Fundamental Ratings
GEDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CISCFGEDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GEDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UDEC35.490.17
+0.50%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec
XDJL35.280.18
+0.50%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd ETF Jul
XHYF37.600.12
+0.33%
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF
SCHQ31.380.03
+0.10%
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
ICSH50.550.02
+0.04%
iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond Active ETF

CISCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CISCF and DMRC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISCF and DMRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CISCF
1D Price
Change %
CISCF100%
N/A
DMRC - CISCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
GEDC - CISCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-29.15%
HLEO - CISCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NONEY - CISCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVTRF - CISCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GEDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEDC and ARBB have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEDC and ARBB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEDC
1D Price
Change %
GEDC100%
-29.15%
ARBB - GEDC
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
CISCF - GEDC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTM - GEDC
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
NONEY - GEDC
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCCN - GEDC
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
More