Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISGX vs FFAFX
CISGX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CISGX vs FFAFX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr Instl
Price$20.35
Change+$0.14 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
CISGX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. CISGX (2.28B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than CISGX: FFAFX (0.53) vs CISGX (0.00). CISGX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: CISGX (5 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). CISGX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). CISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISGX: FFAFX (250) vs CISGX (500000). CISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. FFAFX (7.25). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. CISGX (-0.59).
| CISGX | FFAFX | CISGX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.35 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.35 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.465 | 16.078 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 7.25 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.07 | 64.80 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.59 | 36.98 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | N/A | - |