Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISMX vs MVCAX
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CISMX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Partners Institutional
Price$13.61
Change-$0.18 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.7M
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISMX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. CISMX (925M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CISMX: MVCAX (0.84) vs CISMX (0.48). CISMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CISMX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). CISMX (1.03) and MVCAX (1.00) have similar cost to investors . MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CISMX (22.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CISMX (25000). CISMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.58 vs. MVCAX (-2.60). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.99 vs. CISMX (10.48).
| CISMX | MVCAX | CISMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.00 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.420 | 5.346 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 925M | 17.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.84 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.58 | -2.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.13 | 16.10 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.48 | 53.99 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.13 | 75.48 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement