Ad is loading...
CISMX vs MVCAX
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts CISMX vs MVCAX
Clarkston Partners Institutional
Price$12.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.84M
CISMX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISMX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISMX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. CISMX (975M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than CISMX: MVCAX (0.90) vs CISMX (0.49). CISMX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: CISMX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). CISMX (1.03) and MVCAX (1.00) have similar cost to investors . MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CISMX (22.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISMX: MVCAX (1000) vs CISMX (25000). CISMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.60 vs. MVCAX (-8.14). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.79 vs. CISMX (19.42).
| CISMX | MVCAX | CISMX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.99 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.00 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.578 | -9.648 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 975M | 15.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.90 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.60 | -8.14 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.71 | -6.94 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.42 | 54.79 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers