CIVB
Price
$27.88
Change
+$0.21 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
579.44M
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINN
Price
$20.07
Change
+$0.13 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIVB vs MBINN

CIVB vs MBINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIVB vs. MBINN commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIVB is a Hold and MBINN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CIVB: $27.88 vs. MBINN: $20.07)
Brand notoriety: CIVB and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIVB: 92% vs. MBINN: 31%
Market capitalization -- CIVB: $579.44M vs. MBINN: $0
CIVB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $579.44M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIVB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIVB is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIVB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIVB and MBINN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIVB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIVB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIVB YTD gains are higher at: 27.317 vs. MBINN (13.409). CIVB has less debt than MBINN: CIVB (209M) vs MBINN (4.63B). MBINN has higher revenues than CIVB: MBINN (706M) vs CIVB (176M).
CIVBMBINNCIVB / MBINN
Capitalization579MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.31713.409204%
P/E Ratio10.33N/A-
Revenue176M706M25%
Total CashN/A19.6M-
Total Debt209M4.63B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIVB: Fundamental Ratings
CIVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIVBMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SQBFX16.36N/A
N/A
X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC A
SGGAX85.04N/A
N/A
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth A
VHCAX270.46N/A
N/A
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Adm
HIADX25.37N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA
SPMGX9.45N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R

CIVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIVB has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIVB jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIVB
1D Price
Change %
CIVB100%
+0.76%
MBWM - CIVB
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
FBIZ - CIVB
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
UNTY - CIVB
72%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
IBCP - CIVB
71%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
SRCE - CIVB
70%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with WAFDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then WAFDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
+0.65%
WAFDP - MBINN
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
INBK - MBINN
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
CIVB - MBINN
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
ECBK - MBINN
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
CBFV - MBINN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More