CIXXF
Price
$22.59
Change
+$0.06 (+0.27%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.32B
9 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$54.58
Change
+$0.43 (+0.79%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIXXF vs MAIN

Header iconCIXXF vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts CIXXF vs MAINBanner chart's image
CI Financial
Price$22.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.35K
Capitalization2.32B
Main Street Capital
Price$54.58
Change+$0.43 (+0.79%)
Volume$357.47K
Capitalization4.02B
CIXXF vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXXF vs. MAIN commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXXF is a Hold and MAIN is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CIXXF: $22.59 vs. MAIN: $54.58)
Brand notoriety: CIXXF and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXXF: 51% vs. MAIN: 57%
Market capitalization -- CIXXF: $2.32B vs. MAIN: $4.02B
CIXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.32B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than CIXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CIXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIXXF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+4.19% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than CIXXF($2.32B). CIXXF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: CIXXF (15.72) vs MAIN (8.97). CIXXF YTD gains are higher at: 4.923 vs. MAIN (-4.666). MAIN has less debt than CIXXF: MAIN (1.8B) vs CIXXF (4.36B). CIXXF has higher revenues than MAIN: CIXXF (2.44B) vs MAIN (510M).
CIXXFMAINCIXXF / MAIN
Capitalization2.32B4.02B58%
EBITDA673MN/A-
Gain YTD4.923-4.666-106%
P/E Ratio15.728.97175%
Revenue2.44B510M478%
Total Cash174MN/A-
Total Debt4.36B1.8B242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXXF vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
CIXXF
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
446
SMR RATING
1..100
959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (79). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (44). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIXXF (95). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (54). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (47). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEMKX37.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
LIMIX7.04N/A
N/A
Cromwell Tran Sustainable Focus Instl
EQNBX20.35N/A
N/A
MFS Equity Income B
TVOAX34.43N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Value A
FZIPX12.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index

CIXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIXXF has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIXXF jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXXF
1D Price
Change %
CIXXF100%
+0.27%
BN - CIXXF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
BAM - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
VCTR - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
MAIN - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
APAM - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with GLAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then GLAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+0.79%
GLAD - MAIN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
BXSL - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
HTGC - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
CSWC - MAIN
77%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
SLRC - MAIN
73%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
More