CIXXF
Price
$21.60
Change
-$0.15 (-0.69%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
65 days until earnings call
MAIN
Price
$55.01
Change
-$0.61 (-1.10%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIXXF vs MAIN

Header iconCIXXF vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts CIXXF vs MAINBanner chart's image
CI Financial
Price$21.60
Change-$0.15 (-0.69%)
Volume$25.92K
CapitalizationN/A
Main Street Capital
Price$55.01
Change-$0.61 (-1.10%)
Volume$2.86K
CapitalizationN/A
CIXXF vs MAIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIXXF vs. MAIN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIXXF is a Sell and MAIN is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CIXXF: $21.60 vs. MAIN: $55.62)
Brand notoriety: CIXXF and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIXXF: 97% vs. MAIN: 109%
Market capitalization -- CIXXF: $2.32B vs. MAIN: $4.02B
CIXXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.32B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than CIXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIXXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than CIXXF.

Price Growth

CIXXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.55% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIXXF is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than CIXXF($2.32B). CIXXF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: CIXXF (15.72) vs MAIN (8.97). CIXXF YTD gains are higher at: 91.829 vs. MAIN (39.107). MAIN has less debt than CIXXF: MAIN (1.8B) vs CIXXF (4.36B). CIXXF has higher revenues than MAIN: CIXXF (2.44B) vs MAIN (510M).
CIXXFMAINCIXXF / MAIN
Capitalization2.32B4.02B58%
EBITDA673MN/A-
Gain YTD91.82939.107235%
P/E Ratio15.728.97175%
Revenue2.44B510M478%
Total Cash174MN/A-
Total Debt4.36B1.8B242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIXXF vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
CIXXF
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6123
SMR RATING
1..100
9112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
145
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (73). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIXXF (61). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIXXF (91). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than CIXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (43). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

CIXXF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIN (45). This means that CIXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIXXFMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EURAUD1.65N/A
N/A
Euro - Australian Dollar
HKDJPY19.82N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Japan Yen
XAGUSD30.52N/A
N/A
Silver Ounce - United States Dollar
CNRUX29.86-0.13
-0.43%
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Instl
JVSCX15.40-0.21
-1.35%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value C

CIXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIXXF has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIXXF jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIXXF
1D Price
Change %
CIXXF100%
-0.69%
BN - CIXXF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
BAM - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
VCTR - CIXXF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
MAIN - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
APAM - CIXXF
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with HTGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then HTGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+0.52%
HTGC - MAIN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
ARCC - MAIN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
CSWC - MAIN
66%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
MFIC - MAIN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
FSK - MAIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More