Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CKKRX vs NLGAX
CKKRX vs NLGAX Comparison
Open Charts CKKRX vs NLGAX
CKKRX vs NLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CKKRX vs. NLGAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKKRX is a Hold and NLGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKKRX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. NLGAX (323M). CKKRX pays higher dividends than NLGAX: CKKRX (4.17) vs NLGAX (2.91). CKKRX was incepted earlier than NLGAX: CKKRX (14 years) vs NLGAX (30 years). NLGAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CKKRX (0.69). NLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CKKRX (12.00). CKKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLGAX: CKKRX (0) vs NLGAX (2000). CKKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. NLGAX (4.89). CKKRX return over 5 years is better than : 14.07 vs. NLGAX (8.65).
| CKKRX | NLGAX | CKKRX / NLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.867 | 3.047 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 323M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 2.91 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.65 | 4.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.07 | 31.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | 8.65 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.00 | 30.01 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement