It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +3.06% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.10%.
CL is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
CL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CL | FSTA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago40% | 8 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA | 100% | +1.29% | ||
KO - FSTA | 73% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
PEP - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
MDLZ - FSTA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
CL - FSTA | 66% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
PG - FSTA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More |