CL
Price
$87.93
Change
-$0.52 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
74.02B
5 days until earnings call
GRF
Price
$10.26
Change
-$0.22 (-2.10%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Net Assets
48.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL vs GRF

Header iconCL vs GRF Comparison
Open Charts CL vs GRFBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$87.93
Change-$0.52 (-0.59%)
Volume$3.19M
Capitalization74.02B
Eagle Capital Growth Fund
Price$10.26
Change-$0.22 (-2.10%)
Volume$814
Net Assets48.45M
CL vs GRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. GRF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and GRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CL: $87.93)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.26% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL: Fundamental Ratings
CL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
7
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGGO32.690.25
+0.77%
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
MMU9.870.05
+0.51%
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund
MSLC52.550.23
+0.44%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Eq ETF
SIHY45.870.03
+0.05%
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
IBIB25.320.01
+0.02%
iShares iBonds Oct 2025 Term Tips ETF

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
-0.59%
PG - CL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
KMB - CL
68%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
CHD - CL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
UL - CL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CLX - CL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More

GRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRF and GOOGL have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRF and GOOGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRF
1D Price
Change %
GRF100%
-2.10%
GOOGL - GRF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
DHIL - GRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
CL - GRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
BEN - GRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
PEP - GRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More