CLB
Price
$11.45
Change
+$0.35 (+3.15%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
527.81M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NINE
Price
$11.23
Change
+$0.30 (+2.74%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
156.66M
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLB vs NINE

CLB vs NINE Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLB vs. NINE commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLB is a Buy and NINE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CLB: $11.45 vs. NINE: $11.23)
Brand notoriety: CLB and NINE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLB: 103% vs. NINE: 47%
Market capitalization -- CLB: $527.81M vs. NINE: $156.66M
CLB [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $527.81M. NINE’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $156.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $70.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNINE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NINE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLB and NINE are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NINE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NINE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLB is a better buy in the short-term than NINE.

Price Growth

CLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +3.25% price change this week, while NINE (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

NINE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.87% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLB($528M) has a higher market cap than NINE($157M). NINE YTD gains are higher at: 3148.481 vs. CLB (-28.478). CLB has more cash in the bank: 22.8M vs. NINE (11.2M). NINE has less debt than CLB: NINE (127M) vs CLB (168M).
CLBNINECLB / NINE
Capitalization528M157M336%
EBITDA68.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-28.4783148.481-1%
P/E Ratio18.77N/A-
Revenue525MN/A-
Total Cash22.8M11.2M204%
Total Debt168M127M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLB vs NINE: Fundamental Ratings
CLB
NINE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
68100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLB's Valuation (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NINE (56). This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to NINE’s over the last 12 months.

NINE's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CLB (100). This means that NINE’s stock grew similarly to CLB’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's SMR Rating (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as NINE (100). This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to NINE’s over the last 12 months.

NINE's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (83). This means that NINE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NINE (97). This means that CLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than NINE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLBNINE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NINE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODVYX39.56N/A
N/A
Invesco Developing Markets Y
NBNAX16.02N/A
N/A
Neuberger International Sel A
LAVYX17.63N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity I
WFDRX33.74N/A
N/A
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
EICGX16.89N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance China Equity I

CLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLB has been loosely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLB jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLB
1D Price
Change %
CLB100%
+3.15%
SLB - CLB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
TTI - CLB
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
NOV - CLB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
DNOW - CLB
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTI - CLB
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More