Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FBAKX
CLBAX vs FBAKX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FBAKX
CLBAX vs FBAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FBAKX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FBAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBAKX (66B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FBAKX: CLBAX (1.79) vs FBAKX (1.58). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FBAKX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FBAKX (18 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBAKX (41.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FBAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.11 vs. CLBAX (12.06). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. FBAKX (21.81).
| CLBAX | FBAKX | CLBAX / FBAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.39 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.39 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 10.720 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 66B | 436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.58 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 16.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 42.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 21.81 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 82.86 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement