Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FCISX
CLBAX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FCISX
CLBAX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FCISX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FCISX (80.6B). FCISX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FCISX (4.64) vs CLBAX (1.82). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FCISX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). FCISX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: CLBAX (250) vs FCISX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. FCISX (10.70). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.32 vs. FCISX (29.19).
| CLBAX | FCISX | CLBAX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.11 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.11 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.393 | 6.824 | 152% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.6B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 4.64 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 10.70 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.19 | 32.99 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.32 | 29.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.11 | 75.99 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers