Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FISRX
CLBAX vs FISRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FISRX
CLBAX vs FISRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FISRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FISRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FISRX (79.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FISRX (5.04) vs CLBAX (1.79). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FISRX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FISRX (25 years). FISRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: CLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. FISRX (10.16). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. FISRX (29.50).
| CLBAX | FISRX | CLBAX / FISRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.96 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.96 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 5.155 | 166% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.5B | 362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 5.04 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 10.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 29.83 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 29.50 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 75.67 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement