Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FISRX
CLBAX vs FISRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FISRX
CLBAX vs FISRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FISRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FISRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FISRX (79.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FISRX (5.03) vs CLBAX (1.82). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FISRX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FISRX (25 years). FISRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: CLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). FISRX (11.54) and CLBAX (11.32) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. FISRX (30.03).
| CLBAX | FISRX | CLBAX / FISRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.96 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.96 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.404 | 5.579 | 151% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.5B | 362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 5.03 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 11.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 29.78 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 30.03 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.45 | 78.35 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers