Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FKINX (5.18) vs CLBAX (1.78). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FKINX (78 years). FKINX (0.61) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). FKINX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.32 vs. FKINX (11.62). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. FKINX (31.89).
| CLBAX | FKINX | CLBAX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.861 | 4.746 | 187% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 93% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.4B | 363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 5.18 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.32 | 11.62 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.68 | 32.05 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.23 | 31.89 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.76 | 85.38 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement