Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FKINX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (80.2B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FKINX (5.22) vs CLBAX (1.82). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). FKINX (0.61) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). FKINX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. FKINX (12.00). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.57 vs. FKINX (32.06).
| CLBAX | FKINX | CLBAX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.259 | 6.507 | 158% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 93% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 80.2B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 5.22 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.77 | 12.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.07 | 33.61 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.57 | 32.06 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.64 | 82.96 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers