Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FKINX
CLBAX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FKINX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FKINX (5.19) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). FKINX (0.61) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). FKINX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). FKINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. CLBAX (5.93). CLBAX (32.92) and FKINX (32.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBAX | FKINX | CLBAX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.963 | 6.143 | 130% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 93% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 79.4B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 5.19 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 8.87 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 34.30 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.92 | 32.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.63 | 83.48 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement