Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FNCFX
CLBAX vs FNCFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FNCFX
CLBAX vs FNCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FNCFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FNCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FNCFX (79.7B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: FNCFX (5.38) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FNCFX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FNCFX (13 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FNCFX (0.42). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: CLBAX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). FNCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. CLBAX (6.67). FNCFX (33.96) and CLBAX (33.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBAX | FNCFX | CLBAX / FNCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.42 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.42 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 6.325 | 134% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 79.7B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 5.38 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 9.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 34.53 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 33.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 87.76 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers