Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FOBAX
CLBAX vs FOBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FOBAX
CLBAX vs FOBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FOBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FOBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FOBAX (81.3M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FOBAX: CLBAX (1.79) vs FOBAX (1.20). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FOBAX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FOBAX (30 years). FOBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: CLBAX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. FOBAX (0.27). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.54 vs. FOBAX (3.31).
| CLBAX | FOBAX | CLBAX / FOBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.91 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.32 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.893 | 3.927 | 201% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 81.3M | 354,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.20 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | 0.27 | 3,820% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.70 | 14.67 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.54 | 3.31 | 1,014% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.23 | 31.95 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers