Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FOBAX
CLBAX vs FOBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FOBAX
CLBAX vs FOBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FOBAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FOBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FOBAX (82.4M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FOBAX: CLBAX (1.82) vs FOBAX (1.18). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FOBAX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FOBAX (30 years). FOBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: CLBAX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. FOBAX (1.77). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.56 vs. FOBAX (5.11).
| CLBAX | FOBAX | CLBAX / FOBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.91 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.32 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.286 | 6.488 | 159% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 82.4M | 343,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.18 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 1.77 | 680% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 20.58 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.56 | 5.11 | 696% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.63 | 35.36 | 270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers