Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FOBPX
CLBAX vs FOBPX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FOBPX
CLBAX vs FOBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FOBPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FOBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FOBPX (80.7M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FOBPX: CLBAX (1.80) vs FOBPX (1.43). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FOBPX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FOBPX (15 years). FOBPX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBPX (21.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBPX: CLBAX (250) vs FOBPX (5000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. FOBPX (-1.83). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. FOBPX (3.99).
| CLBAX | FOBPX | CLBAX / FOBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.74 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 5.031 | 169% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 80.7M | 353,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.43 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -1.83 | -364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 18.40 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 3.99 | 833% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 36.93 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers