Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FOBPX
CLBAX vs FOBPX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FOBPX
CLBAX vs FOBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FOBPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FOBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FOBPX (81.8M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FOBPX: CLBAX (1.79) vs FOBPX (1.47). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FOBPX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FOBPX (15 years). FOBPX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBPX (21.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBPX: CLBAX (250) vs FOBPX (5000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. FOBPX (1.68). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. FOBPX (4.16).
| CLBAX | FOBPX | CLBAX / FOBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.74 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.08 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 4.056 | 211% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 81.8M | 352,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.47 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 1.68 | 720% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 16.02 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 4.16 | 837% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 34.07 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers