Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSAAX
CLBAX vs FSAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSAAX
CLBAX vs FSAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSAAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FSAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSAAX (5.65B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FSAAX: CLBAX (1.79) vs FSAAX (1.58). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSAAX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FSAAX (19 years). FSAAX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSAAX (29.00). FSAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSAAX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. CLBAX (12.06). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. FSAAX (26.44).
| CLBAX | FSAAX | CLBAX / FSAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.92 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.95 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 9.959 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.65B | 5,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.58 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 14.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 38.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 26.44 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 86.56 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement