Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSANX
CLBAX vs FSANX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSANX
CLBAX vs FSANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSANX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FSANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSANX (5.6B). FSANX (1.85) and CLBAX (1.82) have matching dividends . CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSANX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FSANX (19 years). FSANX (0.65) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSANX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.87 vs. CLBAX (11.79). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.32 vs. FSANX (28.90).
| CLBAX | FSANX | CLBAX / FSANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.63 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.65 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.393 | 11.951 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.6B | 5,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.85 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 13.87 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.19 | 45.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.32 | 28.90 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.11 | 92.69 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement