Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSATX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSATX (5.65B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FSATX: CLBAX (1.79) vs FSATX (1.36). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FSATX (19 years). FSATX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). CLBAX (4%) and FSATX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSATX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. CLBAX (10.52). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. FSATX (23.34).
| CLBAX | FSATX | CLBAX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.17 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.000 | 9.005 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.65B | 5,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.36 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 11.69 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.20 | 36.09 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.76 | 23.34 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.65 | 80.48 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement