Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSATX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSATX (5.61B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FSATX: CLBAX (1.78) vs FSATX (1.37). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FSATX (19 years). FSATX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). CLBAX (4%) and FSATX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSATX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSATX (14.14) and CLBAX (13.64) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.40 vs. FSATX (24.49).
| CLBAX | FSATX | CLBAX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.17 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.861 | 9.064 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.37 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | 14.14 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.71 | 39.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.40 | 24.49 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.81 | 87.75 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement