Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSATX
CLBAX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSATX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSATX (5.7B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than FSATX: CLBAX (1.80) vs FSATX (1.36). CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FSATX (19 years). FSATX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). CLBAX (4%) and FSATX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSATX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. CLBAX (5.93). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.92 vs. FSATX (23.35).
| CLBAX | FSATX | CLBAX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.17 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.963 | 9.834 | 81% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.7B | 5,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.36 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 8.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 40.82 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.92 | 23.35 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.63 | 80.70 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement