Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSNIX
CLBAX vs FSNIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSNIX
CLBAX vs FSNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSNIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and FSNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSNIX (5.61B). CLBAX (1.78) and FSNIX (1.78) have matching dividends . CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSNIX: CLBAX (24 years) vs FSNIX (19 years). FSNIX (0.70) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. CLBAX (16.71). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. FSNIX (29.94).
| CLBAX | FSNIX | CLBAX / FSNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.70 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 10.428 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.78 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.71 | 18.46 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 43.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.84 | 29.94 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.00 | 99.97 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement