Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs FSNIX
CLBAX vs FSNIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs FSNIX
CLBAX vs FSNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. FSNIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and FSNIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSNIX (5.7B). CLBAX (1.80) and FSNIX (1.76) have matching dividends . CLBAX was incepted earlier than FSNIX: CLBAX (25 years) vs FSNIX (19 years). FSNIX (0.70) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs CLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. CLBAX (6.67). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. FSNIX (25.78).
| CLBAX | FSNIX | CLBAX / FSNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.70 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 9.842 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.7B | 5,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.76 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 9.40 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 41.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 25.78 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 90.85 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement