Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs HDOGX
CLBAX vs HDOGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs HDOGX
CLBAX vs HDOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. HDOGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and HDOGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. HDOGX (51.2M). HDOGX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: HDOGX (1.97) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than HDOGX: CLBAX (25 years) vs HDOGX (28 years). HDOGX (3.25) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HDOGX (35.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDOGX: CLBAX (250) vs HDOGX (2500). HDOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.75 vs. CLBAX (6.67). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. HDOGX (31.13).
| CLBAX | HDOGX | CLBAX / HDOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 3.25 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 3.25 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 8.933 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 51.2M | 556,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 14.75 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 28.87 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 31.13 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 38.08 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers